Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  78 / 116 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 78 / 116 Next Page
Page Background

76

Contribution of different variable input cost items

to the total variable input cost of maize

The main focus of this section is to express different variable input cost

items as a percentage of the total variable input costs.

NORTH WESTERN FREE STATE

Graph 16

shows the average percentage contribution of selected

variable input costs during two different seasons with maize produc-

tion in the North Western Free State. Fertiliser and lime, which are the

biggest contributing inputs for a maize producer, contributed a cal-

culated 30% during the 2010/2011 season and increased to 33,2% to

the total variable input cost seven seasons later.

Fuel contributed 13% to the total variable input cost during the

2010/2011 season. The decrease in fuel usage is evident as the latest

information indicates a contribution of 11,4%; this is due to the change

in producer’s production practises. Repairs and parts contributed 9,0%

and showed a declining trend in terms of its relative contribution to the

total variable input cost. Seed cost showed an increase in its relative

contribution to the total variable input cost, while the cost for chemical

control also increased from 7% during 2010/2011 to 9,5% in 2017/2018

of the total variable input cost. This is simply to illustrate the type of long-

term information that is gathered through this project.

KWAZULU-NATAL

Graph 17

shows the same information as the above but only for

KwaZulu-Natal. Fertiliser and lime contributed a calculated 31% during

the 2010/2011 season but slightly decreased to 30% of the total variable

input cost seven seasons later.

Seed cost is the second biggest contributing input of a maize

producer in the eastern parts of the country, contributing a calculated

18% during the 2017/2018 season. Chemical control contributed 14%

to the total variable input cost during 2010/2011 but decreased to 12%

seven years later.

BUDGETED INCOME AND PRODUCTION COST FIGURES

FOR MAIZE (2019/2020 PRODUCTION SEASON)

With the 2019/2020 season approaching, it is once again time to make

some calculations. The analysis of gross margins is a common and

Bydrae van verskillende veranderlike-insetkoste-items

tot die totale veranderlike insetkoste van mielies

Die vernaamste fokus van hierdie afdeling is om verskillende veran-

derlike-insetkoste-items as ’n persentasie van die totale veranderlike

insetkoste uit te druk.

NOORDWES-VRYSTAAT

Grafiek 16

toon die gemiddelde persentasiebydrae van geselekteerde

veranderlike insetkoste tot mielieproduksie in die Noordwes-Vrystaat

tydens twee verskillende seisoene. Kunsmis en kalk, wat die grootste

bydraende insette vir ’n mielieprodusent is, het in die 2010/2011-seisoen

’n berekende 30% bygedra, en dit het sewe seisoene later tot 33,2% van

die totale veranderlike insetkoste toegeneem.

Brandstof het in die 2010/2011-seisoen 13% tot die veranderlike inset-

koste bygedra. Die daling in brandstofverbruik is duidelik, aangesien

die jongste inligting as gevolg van die verandering in produsente se

produksiepraktyke op ’n bydrae van 11,4% dui. Herstelwerk en on-

derdele het 9,0% bygedra en ’n dalende tendens ten opsigte van die

relatiewe bydrae tot die totale veranderlike insetkoste getoon. Saad-

koste het ’n styging in die relatiewe bydrae tot die totale veranderlike

insetkoste getoon, terwyl die koste vir chemiese beheer ook vanaf 7%

van die totale veranderlike insetkoste in 2010/2011 tot 9,5% in 2017/2018

gestyg het. Dit illustreer die tipe langtermyninligting wat met behulp van

hierdie projek ingesamel word.

KWAZULU-NATAL

Grafiek 17

toon dieselfde inligting as hierbo, maar net vir KwaZulu-

Natal. Kunsmis en kalk het in die 2010/2011-seisoen ’n berekende 31%

bygedra, en dit het sewe seisoene later effens tot 30% van die totale

veranderlike insetkoste gedaal.

Saadkoste is die tweede grootste bydraende inset vir ’n mielieprodusent

in die oostelike dele van die land en het in die 2017/2018-seisoen ’n bere-

kende 18% bygedra. Chemiese beheer het in 2010/2011 14% tot die ver-

anderlike insetkoste bygedra, maar dit het sewe jaar later tot 12% gedaal.

BEGROTE INKOMSTE- EN PRODUKSIEKOSTESYFERS

VIR MIELIES (2019/2020-PRODUKSIESEISOEN)

Met die 2019/2020-seisoen wat naderkom, is dit weer eens tyd om

berekeninge te doen. Die ontleding van bruto marges is ’n algemene

16 000

14 000

12 000

10 000

8 000

6 000

4 000

2 000

0

R/ha

2002/2003

2003/2004

2004/2005

2005/2006

2006/2007

2007/2008

2008/2009

2009/2010

2010/2011

2011/2012

2012/2013

2013/2014

2014/2015

2015/2016

2016/2017

2017/2018

Source: Grain SA

Bron: Graan SA

9

8

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

0

t/ha

GRAPH 15 – Actual production cost, yield and profit/loss of maize for KwaZulu-Natal.

GRAFIEK 15 – Werklike produksiekoste, opbrengs en wins/verlies van mielies in KwaZulu-Natal.

Total cost per ha

Totale koste per ha

Profit/loss per ha

Wins/verlies per ha

Total variable cost

Totaal lopende koste

Yield (t/ha)

Opbrengs (t/ha)