Previous Page  71 / 84 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 71 / 84 Next Page
Page Background

Improved germplasm

MAS/MAB is an imperative and integral part of this project since

markers are able to confirm if targeted resistance QTL/genes are

present, just a few weeks after germination, compared to more con­

ventional methods, which can take up to five to six months.

The developed material is planted in the field for Fusarium head

blight resistance validation and general performance evaluation. In

the next few years, these combinations will potentially contain four

to five Fusarium head blight scab resistance genes/QTL stacked

from different Fusarium head blight resistance sources. Significant

progress on germplasm development has already been made with

Fusarium head blight/scab resistant entries and nurseries released

annually from 2015, as this pre-breeding programme is a publicly

funded project (Photo 3).

In South Africa, Fusarium head blight/scab research needs the

commitment from both the wheat and barley industries on a selected

organisation/service provider for the accurate, unbiased, reliable,

phenotypic evaluation of Fusarium head blight resistance. In addi­

tion, a shift in focus on monitoring mycotoxin presence in seed lots

is called for. This information can then be used in the final recom­

mendations and classification of released cultivars.

It will greatly assist the South African wheat and barley produc­

ers to make better and more informed decisions on scab/Fusarium

head blight disease associated risks on their farms. Ultimately, this

integrated pre-breeding Fusarium head blight programme will de­

velop higher-yielding scab/Fusarium head blight and mycotoxin

resistant germplasm to the benefit of the South African wheat/

barley producer.

The ARC-Small Grain in Bethlehem is available for more information.

Contact Cathy de Villiers or Dr Scott Sydenham at

058 307 3400,

devilliersc@arc.agric.za

or

syden-

hams@arc.agric.za

.

3

3: The glasshouse in which backcrosses and topcrosses are made.

69

June 2018

Graph 1: Oat aphid numbers from suction traps at Christiana, Hofmeyr and Cookhouse.

If we look at the aphid number peaks in the different areas there

seem to be coincidences between traps. For example, from mid-

October last year (week 41 to week 44), an oat aphid peak was ob­

served in the Christiana trap (

Graph 1

).

The small trap in Hofmeyr showed a huge peak which overlaps with

this period (week 43 to week 45), while the Cookhouse trap reveals a

peak during week 45.

Producers in the Eastern Cape were cutting their oats during this

period for silage purposes, which forced many aphids from the crop

and locally moving aphids are easily trapped by the small trap.

A detailed look at air current patterns during this period revealed

a possible explanation for these aphid numbers to peak at almost

the same time. During the week of 15 November last year, air cur­

rents were heading from the south inland over the country in a

slight north-western direction passing over Hofmeyr (

Figure 1

).

In the Orange River region of the Northern Cape, these currents

made an almost 90° turn in an easterly direction, heading all the way

over the Kimberley, Christiana and Vaalharts areas (Figure 1). Wind

speed at that time was 40 km/h to 60 km/h, which may have carried

aphids within a day to the Christiana area.

However, since air currents change every day, the opposite could

also be true, carrying aphids to different production areas in short

times and thus enabling the spread of plant viruses between regions.

For a better understanding and forecasting of aphid migration, the

physical on-farm activities and air current patterns should also be

considered in the analysis of aphid flight data.

For further information contact Dr Goddy Prinsloo at

prinsloogj@arc.agric.za

or 082 875 3401.